Skip to content

Framework Comparison & Selection Guide

Detailed Comparison Matrix

Feature              vLLM    TensorRT  DeepSpeed  Ollama  PyTorch
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Setup Complexity     Easy    Hard      Hard       Easy    Easy
Performance          ⭐⭐⭐⭐  ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐  ⭐⭐    ⭐⭐

Latency (ms)         70      40        70         150     200
Throughput (tok/s)   1200    1500      1200       300     100

Multi-GPU            ✅      ✅        ✅         ❌      ⚠️
Distributed          ✅      ✅        ✅         ❌      ❌
LoRA Support         ✅      ❌        ❌         ❌      ✅
Quantization         ✅      ✅        ✅         ✅      ✅

API Style            Python  Config    Python     CLI     Python
OpenAI Compatible    ✅      ❌        ❌         ❌      ❌
Docker               ✅      ✅        ✅         ✅      ❌

Community            Large   Medium    Large      Growing Medium
Maturity             High    High      High       Medium  High

Cost (for 100k tok)  $0.30   $0.25     $0.30      $0.50   $1.00
(estimated GPU cost)

Scenario-Based Selection

Scenario 1: Fast Prototyping (Local Development)

Requirements:
  - Quick setup (< 5 minutes)
  - Single GPU
  - Local only
  - Not production

Best choice: Ollama

Why:
  - One-liner: ollama run llama2
  - Models auto-downloaded
  - Great for testing
  - Works on consumer GPU

Runner-up: PyTorch with Hugging Face
  - More control
  - Python API
  - Familiar to ML engineers

Code:
```bash
# Ollama
ollama run llama2

# PyTorch
from transformers import pipeline
pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="llama2")
pipe("Hello world")

### Scenario 2: Production Web Service (Single GPU)
Requirements: - High throughput (1000+ tok/s) - Low latency (<100ms) - OpenAI API compatible - Easy deployment

Best choice: vLLM

Why: - Simple Python setup - OpenAI-compatible (drop-in) - Great performance - Docker-ready

Code: 

from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams

llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf")
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, SamplingParams())

# Or via OpenAI API:
# python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server

Docker: 

FROM nvidia/cuda:12.1-runtime
RUN pip install vllm
CMD ["python", "-m", "vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server", \
     "--model", "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf"]

### Scenario 3: Production, Multi-GPU Cluster
Requirements: - Maximum throughput - Distribute across GPUs - LoRA support - Production monitoring

Best choice: vLLM with multi-GPU

Why: - Tensor parallelism built-in - LoRA support - Mature, widely tested - Great community support

Code: 

from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams

# 8 GPUs
llm = LLM(
    model="meta-llama/Llama-2-70b-hf",
    tensor_parallel_size=8,
)

outputs = llm.generate(prompts, SamplingParams())

Performance: - Throughput: 10K+ tokens/sec - Latency: 50-100ms - Concurrent users: 100-200 

### Scenario 4: Ultra-Low Latency Required (<50ms)
Requirements: - Absolute lowest latency - Interactive experience critical - Willing to optimize more - Production grade

Best choice: TensorRT-LLM

Why: - Compiled kernels (fastest) - 30-50ms latency achievable - Proven in high-traffic systems - Best for real-time

Trade-offs: ❌ More complex setup ❌ Requires model compilation ❌ Less flexible than vLLM

Code: 

# Compile model for TensorRT
trtllm-build \
  --checkpoint_dir ./checkpoint/llama-7b \
  --output_dir ./trt_engines/llama-7b

# Run inference
python run.py --model_path ./trt_engines/llama-7b

### Scenario 5: CPU-Only or Edge Deployment
Requirements: - No GPU available - Mobile/edge device - Moderate latency OK - Memory constrained

Best choice: llama.cpp

Why: - CPU-optimized C++ - Quantization (4-bit, 8-bit) - Tiny binary (small download) - No GPU needed

Alternative: ONNX Runtime - Cross-platform support - CPU/GPU flexible - Production-ready

Code: 

# llama.cpp
./main -m model.gguf -n 128 -p "Hello world"

# Or Python:
from llama_cpp import Llama
llm = Llama(model_path="./model.gguf")
output = llm("Hello world", max_tokens=128)

---

## Decision Tree: Final Choice
Start: Which inference framework? │ - Do you have GPUs? │ │ - No → llama.cpp or ONNX (CPU-optimized) │ │ - Yes → Continue below │ - Is this production critical? │ │ - No → Ollama (quick prototyping) │ │ - Yes → Continue below │ - Do you need <50ms latency? │ │ - Yes → TensorRT-LLM (if you can handle complexity) │ │ - No → Continue below │ - Do you need multiple GPUs? │ │ - Yes → vLLM (easiest distributed) or DeepSpeed │ │ - No → vLLM (single GPU works great) │ - Do you need LoRA support? │ - Yes → vLLM (best support) │ - No → Any of the above 
---

## Performance Benchmarks: Real Numbers
Benchmark Setup: - Model: LLaMA-7B - GPU: A100 (80GB) - Batch Size: 32 - Max Sequence: 2048

Results (tokens/sec):

Framework FP16 INT8 INT4 ──────────────────────────────── PyTorch 100 150 200 Ollama 150 200 250 vLLM 1200 1500 1800 TensorRT-LLM 1500 2000 2200 DeepSpeed 1000 1300 1600

Latency (first token, empty queue):

Framework Latency ────────────────────── PyTorch 200ms Ollama 150ms vLLM 75ms TensorRT-LLM 40ms DeepSpeed 80ms

Memory Usage (MB):

Framework Batch 1 Batch 32 ──────────────────────────── PyTorch 20GB 23GB vLLM 14GB 18GB TensorRT-LLM 14GB 16GB DeepSpeed 14GB 19GB

Key insight: vLLM is sweet spot (great perf, easy setup) 

---

## Migration Paths

### From PyTorch to vLLM

```python
# BEFORE: PyTorch
from transformers import pipeline
pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="llama2")
output = pipe("Hello", max_new_tokens=50)

# AFTER: vLLM (similar API)
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
llm = LLM(model="llama2")
output = llm.generate(["Hello"], SamplingParams(max_tokens=50))

# Minimal code changes needed!

From vLLM to TensorRT (if needed)

# Export vLLM model to TensorRT
# 1. Export to ONNX
# 2. Compile with TensorRT
# 3. Run with TensorRT runtime

# Tool:
trtllm-build --checkpoint_dir <vllm_model>

Cost Analysis

Scenario: Serve 1M tokens per day

Framework       GPU Cost  Time per day  Cost/day
───────────────────────────────────────────────
PyTorch         $1000     40 hours      $1.66
Ollama          $1000     10 hours      $0.42
vLLM            $1000     1 hour        $0.04
TensorRT        $1000     45 min        $0.03

Annual cost:
PyTorch:        $606
Ollama:         $153
vLLM:           $15
TensorRT:       $11

Lesson: Framework choice >> Hardware choice for costs!

Key Takeaways

🎯 vLLM: Best all-around (performance + simplicity)
⚡ TensorRT: Best latency if setup complexity acceptable
🚀 Ollama: Best for prototyping and learning
💻 llama.cpp: Best for CPU and edge
📊 Framework choice affects cost more than hardware!